Jobs by JobLookup

How one family prepared to pay for college — twice



 Like many parents, Brett Wright, an advisor and entrepreneur from Palisades, New York, always prioritized his kids’ education. Both he and his wife, Yvonne, grew up with parents who were teachers and school administrators.

When his daughters were still very young, he began saving enough money to pay for college — or so he thought.

“Paying for college was something we started early on with different savings accounts, not really realizing what the true expense of college was going to be,” he said, in an interview for College Ave. “College tuition has grown exponentially, so what we thought we were going to need for school was completely inadequate.”

Finding the perfect school

During the application process, his focus had been on encouraging his daughter, Lola, to find the right school. The college had been on her radar for some time, as lacrosse teams started scouting her in eighth grade.

“We started having those conversations pretty early on, just talking about really simple things — whether I wanted a big school or a small school, whether I wanted to go really far away or stay closer to home,” Lola said.

Looking back, the Wrights admit they didn’t emphasize the costs or applying for scholarships enough (even the monthly scholarship sweepstakes from College Ave is a good place to start). Now that Lola has graduated, they reflect on those challenges with humor and have gained valuable insights to share with others.

“We’re very proud of Lola and her sister, Marley. They have worked really hard academically and athletically,” Wright said. “I was a college athlete, so I know it’s not easy to balance. She was a straight-A student in college, so she got her money’s worth.”

Rising tuition costs in real life

They weren’t entirely unprepared, but, their financial plans fell short due to the rising costs of education.

While starting to save money for college early on is smart, their savings simply didn’t go as far as Wright expected. On top of that, once in school, they were surprised by tuition increases of 3% to 5% each year.

“One of the saving instruments that the government allows is a 529 savings program,” he explained. “I thought we were doing well, but that money lasted about a year.”

Amid the excitement and stress of preparing for college, it’s common for parents and students to lack a clear financial plan. A study by College Ave found that less than half of parents and students entering freshman year are confident about how they will cover the costs.

Once Lola was accepted to college, the Wrights took the advisable steps of filling out the Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA) and working with the school’s financial aid office.

“They help you through it, but it feels like you need a degree in filling out forms just to get a degree,” Wright said.

Confusion is typical among FAFSA filers. In 2023, the majority of parents didn’t know about changes to the FAFSA, according to a College Ave survey.

Speaking candidly about the process, Wright added, “At the end of the day, it’s a parents’ document. They like to act like the kids are taking the responsibility, but the reality is it’s the parents filling it out.”

Lola says she’s grateful to her dad for his efforts. “I think I was there for moral support. I had to remember a lot of passwords,” she said. “My dad was really helpful, so I’m really, really appreciative of that.”

Having open and honest conversations about money

After her freshman year, they realized it was time to reassess their financial strategy.

“We had a conversation, where we sat down and went through what the loan looks like, how long it’s going to take to pay it, and what monthly payments are going to be,” Wright said. “It’s the first major business decision that a 17- or 18-year-old kid is going to make — do they want to go to college or not?”

Up to this point, Lola hadn’t fully considered borrowing. “It was definitely great to have an idea of what I was getting myself into and have an idea of how I could plan my future and just know what was coming,” she said.

Taking economics classes in college also helped expand her financial literacy. “To finance college, we used a mix of private and federal loans, as well as on-campus jobs,” she explained.

The Wrights decided to start paying off the loans as soon as they took them out, rather than waiting until after Lola graduated.

For high school students and their parents currently weighing their options, Wright recommended doing research and taking advantage of resources like College Ave.

“There are so many different avenues out there of how you can pay for your education,” he said. “I think other families can benefit by having a plan. Estimate what you think you’re going to need and double it. The more cushion you have, the easier the decisions are made. In the worst-case scenario, you get to the finish line, and you have some money left over.”

Looking at the big picture, the Wrights are grateful for the college journey.

“I think the value of higher education is enormous,” Wright said. “It’s really about the relationships, the friendships, the networking — and taking advantage of the full college experience.”

A federal appeals court on Thursday blocked President Joe Biden's administration from continuing to implement a new student debt relief plan designed to lower monthly payments for millions of Americans.
The St. Louis-based 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals granted a request, opening a new tab by seven Republican-led states to put on hold parts of the U.S. Department of Education's debt relief plan that had not already been blocked by a lower-court judge.
That ruling last month by U.S. District Judge John Ross in St. Louis had blocked the department from granting further loan forgiveness under the administration's Saving on a Valuable Education (SAVE) Plan but had not blocked all of the plans.
That plan provides more generous terms than past income-based repayment plans, lowering monthly payments for eligible borrowers and allowing those whose original principal balances were $12,000 or less to have their debt forgiven after 10 years.
State attorneys general led by Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey subsequently last week asked the 8th Circuit to block the rest of the SAVE Plan. The court did so through a one-page order granting an administrative stay.
Bailey on the social platform X hailed the ruling as a "huge win for every American who still believes in paying their own way." He said the student loan plan "would have saddled working Americans with half a trillion dollars in Ivy League debt."
An Education Department spokesperson said it was assessing the ruling's impact, would be in touch with any borrowers directly affected by it and "will continue to aggressively defend the SAVE Plan."
Biden, a Democrat, announced the SAVE Plan in 2022, alongside a broader $430 billion program that would have fulfilled a campaign promise by cancelling up to $20,000 in debt for up to 43 million Americans. It was ultimately blocked by the conservative-majority U.S. Supreme Court in June 2023.
The SAVE Plan was slated to fully take effect on July 1, though parts of it have already been implemented.
The White House has said that over 20 million borrowers could benefit from the SAVE Plan. The Education Department says that 8 million are already enrolled, including 4.5 million whose monthly payments have been reduced to $0.
The Education Department on Thursday said it had already granted $5.5 billion to 414,000 borrowers through the SAVE Plan.
The administration estimated that the plan would cost taxpayers around $156 billion over 10 years, but Republican state attorneys general argue that its actual cost totaled around $475 billion.
Another federal judge in Kansas had also blocked parts of the SAVE Plan last month, though a different federal appeals court, the Denver-based 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, put part of that decision on hold. A group of Republican-led states have asked the U.S. Supreme Court to reinstate that injunction.

The surge into the U.S. of immigrants lacking permanent legal status has emerged as one of the most politically charged issues of the 2024 presidential election.

Yet the wave of new arrivals has boosted the U.S. economy while helping temper inflation, a top issue for voters.

“It (immigration) is helping to reduce the labor shortage and push down wage pressures” that have fueled price increases, says economist Michael Reid of RBC Capital Markets.

Strong job growth and lower inflation make for an unusual, best-of-both-worlds tandem that has helped the nation avoid a recession.

Yet some recent studies question whether immigrants really have tamped down consumer price increases after figuring in their demand for products and services, which tends to push up prices. And Republicans argue immigrants are taking jobs from Americans, a contention Democrats refute.

At a hearing last week, Sen. J.D. Vance, R-Ohio, who Monday was announced as former President Donald Trump's running mate on the Republican presidential ticket, suggested immigrants are depressing Americans’ wages.

Trump, meanwhile, would severely restrict U.S. entry at the southern border and he has proposed deporting millions of migrants living in the country without legal permission. Even conservative economists have said the strategy would reverse much of the progress on labor shortages and inflation.

President Joe Biden also wants to toughen enforcement at the border with Mexico but his plan is not as sweeping and he has not proposed mass deportations. Analysts say his blueprint would broadly return net immigration to its pre-pandemic level of about 1 million a year while Trump's would result in about half that inflow.

Here’s a look at the debate:

How many immigrants enter the US per year?

The Congressional Budget Office recently estimated net immigration to the U.S. was 2.6 million in 2022, 3.3 million in 2023, and a projected 3.3 million this year. The figures are much higher than previously believed and above the 900,000 average from 2010 to 2019.

About 2.4 million of the entrants were unauthorized, the CBO says, with the vast majority entering at the southern border.

How is the US economy affected by immigration?

Immigrants are doing work that lifts production, and earning income to buy homes, cars, groceries, clothing, health care, and other products and services that expand the nation’s economy.

In other words, they’ve helped keep the nation from slipping into a recession that was widely anticipated last year because of high inflation and interest rates.

In a study last week, the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas estimated immigration is increasing annualized economic growth in a given quarter by 0.7 percentage points at an annual rate. That means it could have comprised half of the tepid 1.4% annualized increase in growth early this year.

A JPMorgan Chase analysis of immigration in 23 developed countries from 1990 to 2020 found that a 1% annual increase in population from immigration – roughly in line with the U.S. gain last year – would boost economic growth by 1.6 percentage points. That’s about half last year’s 3.1% rise in U.S. gross domestic product.   

Others say the immigration-induced GDP bump is more modest. A Brookings Institution report estimated it added a tenth of a percentage point to growth in 2022, two-tenths in 2023, and a projected two-tenths this year.

Foreign-born people come to the U.S. at relatively young ages and 64% to 66% are in the labor force – meaning they’re working or looking for jobs − compared to about 60% of U.S. natives, according to JPMorgan Chase and the Brookings Institution.

Of the 3 million jobs the nation added last year, about a third likely went to newly arrived immigrants, most of who entered the country illegally, RBC Capital Markets estimates.

Can immigration fix labor shortages?

The nation grappled with severe post-pandemic labor shortages from 2021 to 2023. To attract workers, employers pushed up the annual rise in average hourly pay to a peak of 5.9% in early 2022 from 3% before the pandemic.

The influx of immigrants helped ease the worker shortages and tamp down wage growth to about 4%. The gains have especially aided some low-paying industries that struggle most to attract employees, economists say. From December 2021 to December 2023, immigrant employment in leisure and hospitality – which includes restaurants and hotels – increased by 5.5 percentage points, reducing the share of job vacancies by 4.4 percentage points, according to a study by the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.

Employers, in turn, could compete less vigorously for workers, and annual wage growth fell by 3.9 percentage points – accounting for early half the drop in the industry’s pay increases during the two years, from 13.9% to 4.1%.

Across the labor market, Deutsche Bank estimates the immigration spike over the past four years has increased the number of people employed − and reduced total job vacancies − by as much as 3.9 million, easing wage pressures that intensify inflation.

How does wage growth affect inflation?

As businesses passed their higher labor costs to consumers, prices soared, especially for services such as dining out, health care, auto repair, and haircuts.

Pandemic-related supply chain troubles also fueled inflation by pushing up the price of goods such as furniture, appliances, and cars.

Without the immigration spike, the Federal Reserve’s preferred annual inflation measure, which fell from a peak of 5.6% in 2022 to 2.8% in the first quarter, would have been as high as 3.1% to 3.3%, a Deutsche Bank analysis says.

The quarter-to-half-point inflation decline spurred by immigrants is in line with the 0.37 percentage point slide estimated by the Center for Immigration Studies, an anti-immigration think tank.

“It’s too small to make a dent in overall inflation,” says Jason Richwine, resident scholar at the center.

But the pullback is still “notable” and has significant implications, Reid, of RBC Capital Markets, says. After raising its key interest rate to a 23-year high of about 5.1% to fight inflation, the Fed is widely expected to begin cutting interest rates in September, lowering the cost of mortgages and other loans while juicing the stock market.

Absent the immigration surge, inflation likely would have hovered above 3% for several additional months, leading the Fed to keep rates higher for longer and raising the odds of a recession, Reid says.

Do immigrants take jobs from Americans?

At his debate with Biden last month, Trump said many of the jobs immigrants were taking otherwise would be filled by American citizens, particularly Black and Hispanic people.

Reid, though, says U.S.-born workers often aren’t interested in many of the arduous, low-paying jobs sought by immigrants who lack permanent legal status. And Americans generally don’t want jobs. The share of employed prime-age (25-54) people born in the U.S. is at 83%, higher than before the pandemic, Jason Furman, former chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers, wrote in a recent opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal.

Are immigrants depressing wages for Americans?

At a Senate hearing last week, Vance acknowledged immigration has helped ease the labor crunch and slow wage growth. But, he told the witness, Fed Chair Jerome Powell, "It also puts downward pressure on the wages that people earn for their families. Why do we see that as a good thing?”

Instead of relying on immigration, he suggested, employers should have jacked up wages high enough to attract more Americans to their job openings. Presumably, pay increases would then moderate as labor gaps closed.

In a March report, Michael Feroli, chief U.S. economist of JPMorgan Chase, agreed that “wage gains for lower-skilled workers could suffer” because of immigration.

But remedying labor shortages by hiking wages even more sharply for Americans wasn’t practical in many cases, Reid said. The deficits were so severe that there were two jobs for every unemployed worker and many firms couldn’t fill vacancies even with big pay bumps.

Yes. By stoking more consumer demand for products and services, immigration also fuels inflation. And immigrants are more inclined than people born in the U.S. to spend most or all of their income, Feroli wrote in the report.

The effect on prices is especially pronounced in housing, with new immigrants needing as much as 500,000 additional units a year, Feroli says. In June, rent and other housing costs made up about 36% of the monthly inflation rise, according to the consumer price index. The nation already is beset by a big housing shortage and it takes time for developers to respond to unexpected immigration spikes by building homes, Feroli says

At the same time, because most immigrants living in the country without legal permission work in low-wage industries, they spend less overall than those born in the U.S., Reid says. Immigrants, he says, also send an average of $160 a month to their families in their native countries.

The bottom line?

Normally, the effects of an immigration surge on inflation are a wash or may even increase it in the short term, JPMorgan economists Alexander Wise and Jan Loeys wrote in a note to clients. Besides the purchases by new foreign-born residents, immigration gooses demand from companies that need to buy computers, factory machines, or other equipment for their newly hired immigrant workers, the Dallas Fed paper says.

Yet during dire labor shortages, such as the recent episode, immigration may ease inflation because the benefits of expanding the supply of workers outweigh the jolt to household spending, Wise and Loeys suggested.

Do immigrants have a positive net impact on the economy?

Many economists think so. Normally, strong job growth triggers faster price increases by forcing employers to bid up wages to attract a limited pool of U.S. workers and by increasing consumer spending.

The immigration wave, though, "has provided a significant boost to GDP without a corresponding rise in inflation,” says Ron Mau, an economist at the Dallas Fed.

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post