Paul Graham's essay on "founder mode" sparked a heated debate about the best way to run a growing company.
While some praised his assertion that founders should remain deeply involved in their businesses, others argued that a more managerial approach is equally effective. However, for female founders, the concept of founder mode presents a unique set of challenges. A double standard often exists in how male and female leaders are perceived. Behaviors that are lauded in male founders, such as being demanding or ruthless, are often seen as cruel or toxic when exhibited by female leaders. This can make it difficult for women to navigate the delicate balance between being hands-on and being seen as overly controlling or harsh. Many female founders have faced criticism for their intense involvement in their businesses. Sophia Amoruso, the founder of Nasty Gal, and Whitney Wolfe Herd, the founder of Bumble, both experienced negative backlash for their "founder mode" approaches. This double standard can create a climate of fear, where female founders may hesitate to make bold decisions or take risks for fear of being labeled as difficult or unprofessional.
Despite these challenges, some female founders have embraced the founder mode approach. They argue that their deep understanding of their businesses and their ability to make strategic decisions are essential for their companies' success. However, they also recognize the importance of building a strong team and delegating tasks to empower their employees.
The debate over founder mode highlights the need for a more nuanced understanding of leadership. While there may be benefits to a hands-on approach, it is important to recognize that different styles of leadership can be effective. Ultimately, the best approach for a founder will depend on their individual strengths, the needs of their company, and the cultural context in which they operate.
