Skilled At Work

Experience Doesn’t Automatically Create Confidence

New research suggests that leadership confidence develops when people learn to make meaning of their experience—not simply accumulate it.

Leadership experience is often assumed to build confidence. Each successful project, difficult decision, and new responsibility should provide evidence that a leader is capable. Yet many accomplished professionals continue to experience self-doubt and question whether they truly belong in leadership.

New research published in the Journal of Organizational Behavior, based on life-narrative interviews with 22 organizational leaders, offers an explanation. The researchers found that stronger leader identities developed as people interpreted and connected their experiences across different stages of their careers. Over time, many moved from uncertainty and imposter feelings toward a more coherent understanding of themselves as leaders.

The key lesson is simple: experience does not interpret itself.

Experience Builds Competence—But Not Necessarily Identity

Leadership development programs typically emphasize stretch assignments, training, mentoring, promotions, and opportunities to take on greater responsibility. These experiences can strengthen skills and performance, but they do not automatically change how people see themselves.

Consider two managers who successfully lead their teams through a difficult project. One sees the result as evidence of growing judgment and leadership capability. The other attributes the success to the team, favorable circumstances, or luck.

Both gained experience. Only one used that experience to reshape their leadership identity.

This helps explain why simply telling someone to “be more confident” rarely solves the problem. Confidence becomes more durable when people can connect evidence of what they have accomplished with a credible understanding of who they are becoming.

Meaning-Making Turns Experience Into Identity

The research identifies several changes that helped leaders move from uncertainty toward a stronger and more authentic leadership identity.

First, leaders developed greater cognitive complexity—a more nuanced understanding of what leadership can look like. Rather than comparing themselves against a narrow image of the ideal leader, they became more open to different leadership styles and behaviors.

Second, their understanding of leadership became better aligned with their actual experiences. Instead of asking, “Do I look or behave like a leader?” they increasingly asked, “What have my experiences taught me about the leader I am?”

Finally, they gained greater clarity about their own leadership characteristics.

This process can be viewed as a progression:

Experience → Competence → Evidence → Meaning → Leadership Identity → Confidence

Without the meaning-making step, even years of accomplishments may remain disconnected events rather than evidence of a developing leadership identity.

What Managers Can Do

Organizations should continue giving emerging leaders challenging assignments—but they should create deliberate opportunities to interpret those experiences afterward.

A project debrief should not focus only on results, mistakes, and future actions. It can also explore what the experience revealed about the person's developing leadership capacity.

Managers can ask:

  • What did this experience teach you about how you lead?

  • Which assumptions about leadership changed?

  • What did you do that you would not have believed yourself capable of a year ago?

  • What does this experience tell you about the leader you are becoming?

These questions help people connect individual experiences into a coherent narrative about their capabilities and identity.

The Leadership Takeaway

Confidence is better understood as an outcome of leadership development than as its starting point.

Experience matters—but experience alone is incomplete. Leaders become more confident when they learn to recognize, interpret, and integrate what their experiences have already demonstrated.

The goal is not to convince leaders that they are capable.

It is to help them see the evidence for themselves.