I'm pursuing cse btech, so which jobs or specializations or mtech/ms or mba should I do?
I am doing cse btech from a tier 2 college and it has average placements, but my target is not to just get a job immediately (not that we are getting one). I do want to learn more and specialize somewhere to have a better profile. Everyone is doing the same cse degree and no one is getting a good entry level job.
In this job market it's almost impossible to get hired now, so even with computer science which jobs or specializations should I consider? Should I do ms or mtech for that? Then again I have to choose something that won't get replaced by ai. Or should I do an mba? Which skills do I need to learn that would make me different from others? Or should I really prefer business roles?
There are people who have been successfully working for a while now, but even sometimes their suggestions don't work out in recent times. I'm really scared and I still have four years of my college left so I really want to use that.
Jobadvisor
Four years is actually a lot of runway — that changes the whole calculation. You don't need to lock in a specialization or a "will AI take this" answer right now. Here's how I'd think about it.
First, the fear is legitimate, but not fully accurate. The market genuinely is harder than it was 5-10 years ago, especially for generic entry-level roles. But "CSE btech, tier 2, average placements" describes thousands of people applying for the same handful of generic jobs with the same generic resume. The problem usually isn't the degree — it's that almost nobody differentiates themselves during college. That's actually good news for you, because differentiation is very learnable.
What actually differentiates people (regardless of specialization):
- Real projects that solve a real problem, not tutorial clones — deployed, with users or at least a working demo, and code you can explain deeply
- Internships (even unpaid/remote/startup ones) — one real internship beats a 9 CGPA
- Depth in something — not "I know Python, Java, DSA, web dev, ML basics" (everyone writes this), but "I've spent 6 months building distributed systems / security tooling / an ML pipeline and can talk about it for 30 minutes"
- Some public proof of work — GitHub with real commits, a blog, contributions to an open-source project
On AI replacing jobs — the roles most exposed are the ones AI is already good at: writing boilerplate CRUD apps, simple scripts, basic front-end from a spec. What's not going away: systems design, debugging gnarly production issues, security, infrastructure/cloud, data engineering, and — this matters — actually knowing how to use AI tools as a force multiplier rather than being scared of them. The engineers who'll do well aren't the ones who avoided AI-adjacent work, they're the ones who got good at building with and around AI systems (evals, tooling, deployment, agents, MLOps) rather than just prompting ChatGPT.
Reasonably durable specializations from CSE right now: backend/distributed systems, cloud & DevOps, security, data engineering, applied ML/MLOps (distinct from "I did a Kaggle course"). Pick based on genuine interest, not just "which is safest," because you'll only get good at something you can tolerate doing for 500+ hours.
On MTech / MS / MBA — you're asking this way too early, and that's okay, everyone does. Rough guide:
- MTech (India, via GATE) — genuinely useful if you're at a tier 2 college, since it can get you into an IIT/NIT and reset your pedigree for placements. Worth targeting seriously in your 3rd year if research or a stronger brand name appeals to you.
- MS abroad — expensive, and the job market for international students in the US/elsewhere is tough right now (visa sponsorship pressure, layoffs). Only makes sense with either funding, a clear specialization goal (a specific lab/research area), or if you've already got some work experience/projects that make you competitive for it.
- MBA — almost never a good move straight out of undergrad. Top MBA programs want 2-4 years of work experience, and without that an MBA doesn't fix a weak technical profile — it just delays the problem. Consider it later only if you find you genuinely want to move into product/strategy/management, not as an escape hatch from tech.
How I'd use the 4 years if I were you:
- Year 1-2: strong CS fundamentals (DSA, OS, networks, DBMS) + explore 2-3 areas via small projects to find what you don't hate doing
- Sometime by year 2-3: land an internship, even a small one, and pick a lane (backend/security/data/ML infra etc.)
- Year 3: decide MTech (GATE prep) vs MS vs job vs research based on where you actually stand, not on vibes
- Year 4: execute the specific path with real evidence behind it, not a cold application
You genuinely don't have to decide MS/MTech/MBA/job today. Deciding that now, in year 1, based on fear of an uncertain market four years out, would be optimizing for the wrong variable. Do you want me to go deeper on any one of these — like what a strong CSE project portfolio actually looks like, or how GATE/MTech timing works?
How am I supposed to react to a "promotion" that adds 20 hours a week but zero dollars to my paycheck?
So I have been grinding at this tech firm for two years. Always the first one in, last one out. My manager calls me into a 1:1 on Friday and says "Great news, we are promoting you to Senior Project Lead." I was actually excited for about thirty seconds.
i asked about the compensation adjustment and he literally did a double-take. He told me that with the current "market climate" they cant do raises right now, but the title change is a "huge investment" in my future career. Apparently, being a Senior Lead means I now have to manage three juniors and handle the client reporting that my boss used to do. It is just ABSOLUTELY insulting.
They expect me to be grateful for the privilege of doing more work for the exact same paycheck. I should of known something was up when they started talking about "internal growth opportunities" during the last all-hands meeting. It is like they are dangling a carrot but the carrot is just a picture of a carrot.
the kicker is that they already announced it on the company Slack. Now everyone is congratulating me and I'm just sitting here realizing I just volunteered for a massive workload increase without getting a dime more. It feels like I am being punished for being good at my job. Why is this even a thing?
Jobadvisor
That reaction makes complete sense. You noticed something real: they took your work ethic and repackaged it as a reward. The math is straightforward — three direct reports plus your boss's old responsibilities is a real, measurable increase in scope, and "we can't do raises right now" plus "huge investment in your career" is management-speak for "we'd like this for free." Your gut did the arithmetic correctly.
A few things worth separating out, because they call for different responses:
Why this happens (not to excuse it, but it helps to know it's not personal): Titles are free. Money isn't. Companies — especially under budget pressure — have learned that a title bump satisfies people's ego and status needs cheaply, while the comp budget gets rationed elsewhere. It works often enough that they keep doing it, because a lot of people, once they hear "Senior" and get congratulated publicly, feel too awkward to push back. You noticed the trick before it worked on you. That's the important part.
The Slack announcement is the sharpest part of this, and it's worth naming why: it wasn't just premature, it was strategic (whether your manager did it deliberately or not). It creates social pressure — pushing back now feels like you're rejecting a "gift" in front of everyone, which makes you look ungrateful or difficult. That's a bad reason to accept new comp terms. Don't let a Slack message do your negotiating for you.
What you can actually do — and it's not "quietly resent it" or "blow it up":
- Go back to your manager, separate from the emotion of Friday, and say something like: "I'm glad to take this on, but I want to talk through what compensation for the expanded scope looks like — even if it's not immediate, I'd like a concrete plan and timeline." Ask for it in writing eventually, not just verbally.
- If he says "no budget right now," ask directly: "When would there be budget, and what would need to be true for that?" Vague answers here ("market climate," "growth opportunity") are a signal, not a plan. Get specifics or you'll be having this same conversation in a year.
- Treat "Senior Project Lead" as leverage for your next move, whether that's internal (a real comp conversation in 3-6 months, backed by "I've been doing this scope since X") or external (this title, with concrete new responsibilities, is genuinely useful on a resume/LinkedIn for a role elsewhere that will pay for it).
- Don't quietly absorb 20 hours of new work at the old pace forever. If comp doesn't materialize in a reasonable window, that's real information about how this company treats performance — and it's fair to start looking around while still doing the job well enough to keep your options open.
You're not being punished for being good at your job — you're being tested to see if you'll accept less because you're too conscientious to make a fuss. Pushing back doesn't make you ungrateful. It makes you someone who knows what their work is worth.
Want help drafting what to actually say to your manager, or figuring out what a fair ask looks like (raise now vs. review date vs. bonus structure)?
Nothing interests me enough to make it into a career, how to find the right one for me?
(24F) I have a few years of experience in retail and that’s about it. I never went to college after high school, I just went straight to working at a local grocery store. Then I lost my job and I’m trying to get my life back together now, and I’m realizing I’m at that age where I need to find something.
But nothing interests me. I don’t want to do healthcare. I’m not interested in working in HVAC, any of the trades, or tech. I also don’t want to be stuck doing food or retail for the rest of my life. I don’t even want to be stuck in an office.
I want to be able to work up to doing something I will enjoy learning and be good at, but won’t take years of my life doing so.
My biggest interest is gaming, it’s what I love doing the most, but I can’t see myself doing any kind of career in it. I feel like I’m growing out of it and I also don’t feel like it’ll be very profitable for me. Streaming, for one, takes a lot of time to get a decent set up, gain a following, and then having a consistent schedule and having to constantly interact (with possibly stupid people) would drain me fast. I’ve never been good at keeping a consistent social media presence, so the thought of any kind of social media or advertising is a big no to me, unfortunately.
My second interest is in design. This could be fashion design, interior design, character design. I spent a lot of my time in school drawing and as well as designing my own characters. I have thought about becoming a character designer, BUT I only enjoy drawing and designing as a hobby. I wouldn’t want to make it into a career, because I fear that it will drain my love for it. It just doesn’t seem like something profitable or something I want to do in the long run. As a side thing? Maybe.
But I don’t really want to do art or freelancing.
I do like psychology, and law. I like learning the motives behind criminals and researching info about cases.
I’ve also thought about doing airplanes or working as an air traffic controller, but I don’t want to be under stress all the time.
I love animals and wouldn’t mind working with them, but I don’t really have any interest in learning to be a vet. I have thought about possibly being a k9 trainer but I don’t know if I really want to do that either.
I’ve thought about doing bridal, because I’d love to help plan beautiful events and help women feel beautiful but I have no idea how to get my foot in the door doing that.
I do like the thought of working in the city, like at a big bank or something. I used to always look up at the buildings and wonder what it was like to work in an office in one of the top floors.
But could I imagine myself up there? Idk.
I just want to find something for me, but I really don’t know what I want to do with my life. I feel stranded, and I don’t want to be stuck here forever… can I get some pointers? My issue seems to be that I do have some interest in things, but I don’t really have the motivation to really explore and dive into anything as a career…
Jobadvisor
That "stranded" feeling makes sense, but I don't think your issue is actually "nothing interests me." Reading through what you wrote, you've given me a lot of information — you're just seeing it as a scattered list of maybes instead of noticing the pattern underneath it.
Here's the thread I see running through almost everything you listed:
You're drawn to understanding people and making things go smoothly for them — from a structured, somewhat behind-the-scenes position, not a spotlight one. Look at what actually lit you up:
- Psychology and law → you like understanding why people do things (motive, behavior, cases)
- Bridal/events → you want to coordinate something beautiful and make someone feel good, with a plan and a process
- The bank/city office image → not the specific job, but the feeling of being part of something organized, established, competent
- Even your "no" list is informative: you don't want to be the face of something (streaming, social media, freelancing your art) — you want to do the work, not perform it publicly
That's not "no interests." That's a fairly specific person: analytical-but-people-oriented, wants structure and craft, doesn't want public performance or physical/emergency stress. That already rules out a lot and points toward a lot.
Concrete paths that fit this, without years of school:
-
Paralegal / legal assistant — This is probably your strongest match. It's built on exactly what you said you like (case research, understanding motives, how legal arguments work), it's office-based, and most paralegal certificate programs are 6-12 months, not a 4-year degree. You could specialize toward criminal law if the true-crime interest is genuine. Real path to "working in a firm downtown" without law school.
-
Victim advocate / court support roles — Sits right at your psychology + law interest, working with people going through cases, usually through nonprofits or DA's offices. Often doesn't require a degree to start, though some do.
-
Wedding/event coordinator, working under an established planner first — You don't need to "start a bridal business" from scratch. Many planners hire assistants/coordinators with no formal schooling — you learn the trade while getting paid, and see if you actually like the client-facing parts before committing.
-
HR or office operations in a corporate setting (including at a bank) — if the appeal of "working in a big building downtown" is real, HR/ops roles are usually the easiest non-technical door into that world, involve people-understanding, and often start from entry-level admin roles with room to grow.
-
Compliance/records/back-office roles at a bank — less glamorous than the top-floor image in your head, but a real and common way people without a degree end up working at a bank, and can lead upward.
My honest read on the psychology: your issue isn't lack of interest, it's that you're waiting to feel a big "this is it" spark before committing to anything, and that spark usually doesn't arrive before you start — it arrives after a few months of actually doing something and noticing you're good at it. Retail and grocery work wouldn't have taught you that feeling, because none of those roles used the things you're actually drawn to.
Do you want me to help you figure out how to get your foot in the door for one of these — paralegal certificate programs, or how people typically break into event coordinating with no experience?
Tired of writing cover letters for employers not responding to job applications. Should I just be candid and real with cover letters?
Should I stop writing "formal" cover letters and just write "real" ones at this point? I've been applying to dozens of entry level IT jobs since November and I've only gotten 2 interviews in all this time. I don't have a ton of experience but someone's gotta give me the chance to develop. So, what if I start making unorthodox, more "real" cover letters basically asking employers to give me a chance on the job, and let me show that I'm a fast learner (I have a story from my past experience to back this up). I'm just getting really desperate at this point, my student loans are coming for me, and I can only tap into savings for so long. The job market is absolutely brutal right now, and I just want a chance to show that I'm competent.
Jobadvisor
That frustration is completely fair — 2 interviews from dozens of applications since November, with loans coming due, is a genuinely rough spot to be in. Let's actually figure out if the cover letter is the problem, because "unorthodox and real" can work brilliantly or backfire badly depending on how it's done.
First, a quick reality check that matters: for entry-level IT roles, the cover letter is very rarely why you're not getting interviews. It's usually the resume getting filtered before a human even reads the cover letter — ATS keyword matching, lack of relevant keywords, or the resume not clearly showing IT-relevant skills. So before rewriting cover letters, it's worth asking: are you sure it's the letter and not the resume/ATS funnel? Happy to look at that angle too.
On "real" vs "formal" — the answer is: be real, but not raw. There's a real difference between two things people mean by "candid":
Version A (usually backfires): "I'm desperate, no one's giving me a chance, please just take a chance on me, I promise I'm a fast learner." This reads as need-based, not value-based. Hiring managers aren't being cruel by not responding to this — they're hiring for what you can do for them, and this framing centers your situation, not their problem.
Version B (this is the "real" that actually works): Ditch the generic template language ("I am writing to express my interest in..."), but keep the structure aimed at their need. Open with something specific about their team/product/problem, tell the concrete story you mentioned (the "fast learner" proof) as a compressed, specific anecdote — not an abstract claim — and connect it directly to something in the job posting. Real ≠ emotional appeal. Real = specific, human, no corporate filler, but still clearly about solving their problem.
Example of the shift:
- Generic: "I am a hardworking and fast learner who is passionate about IT and would be a great addition to your team."
- Real + effective: "Last year I had 48 hours to learn [specific tool/system] with zero background in it, because [specific situation], and ended up [concrete outcome]. That's the kind of ramp-up speed I'd bring to your junior/helpdesk role."
That's honest, memorable, and un-templated — but it's evidence, not a plea.
One more thing worth saying directly: if you're at the point where savings are running low, a cover letter rewrite is a slow lever to pull. It might be worth splitting your energy — some volume applying broadly, and some effort going into faster channels: referrals (even weak LinkedIn connections at target companies), contract/temp IT roles or helpdesk gigs through staffing agencies (Robert Half, TEKsystems, etc. — these often move in days not months and can be a foot in the door), and directly messaging hiring managers on LinkedIn with a short, specific note rather than only relying on the formal application + cover letter pipeline.
Want to paste one of your actual cover letters (or the resume) so I can help rewrite it with this "specific and real, not desperate" approach?
Good paying stable careers outside of nursing in 2026?
I’m 19F and graduated HS in 2025 with an awful GPA. For the past few years, I’ve been trying to figure out what I want to do for a career, but I keep getting stuck and can’t seem to decide on anything.
My parents both work blue collar jobs (HVAC and Dog grooming), so I don’t really have much exposure to college career paths. I can’t do patient-facing medical care (working directly with sick people.)
Lately, I’ve been looking into accounting, but the long hours, unpaid overtime, offshoring, and AI risk have made me concerned. A lot of the people on the accounting subreddit even say they wish they’d just gone into healthcare or been a plumber…which hasn’t exactly made me confident in that choice.
Engineering has crossed my mind too, but math has always been my worst subject. I’ve struggled with it since Elementary school, so I’m worried I’d just be setting myself up for failure in college if I went that route.
What fields would you recommend looking into in 2026 that are stable and have the potential to make 100k+? If you were in my position, what career paths would you go for?
Jobadvisor
Okay, first — genuinely, a "bad GPA" at 19 means almost nothing for the paths I'd point you toward. None of what follows cares much about your high school transcript.
A few things stand out from what you've said: you don't want patient-facing sick-people work, you're wary of accounting's specific problems (unpaid overtime, offshoring, AI exposure), and you're worried math will sink you in engineering. That's a coherent set of constraints, and it actually points pretty clearly toward a few directions.
Skilled trades, especially electrical This is worth taking seriously, not as a consolation prize. Electricians currently sit around a $62K median with BLS projecting 11% growth through 2034, driven by EV charging, solar installation, data center buildouts, and aging-grid replacement. The real money is in ownership: the path is training in the trade, working as a journeyman for 5-7 years earning $60,000-$90,000 while learning the business side, then getting licensed and starting your own operation — at which point median income jumps to $130,000-$200,000, and top operators in growth metros clear $400,000-$800,000+. Yes, your dad's in HVAC — but electrical, plumbing, and elevator work (the highest-paid trade with no degree, median $106,580) are different enough that this isn't just repeating his path. The math involved is arithmetic and basic algebra applied to real things — not the abstract math that tanked you in school. A lot of people who "can't do math" in a classroom do fine with it once it's attached to a wire gauge or a pipe diameter.
Air traffic control Worth a serious look if you like fast-paced, high-stakes decision-making. Air traffic controllers earn $144K+ a year on average, more than double what most college graduates earn in their first jobs, and only about a quarter of the job is exposed to automation since the rest requires real-time human decision-making. No bachelor's required — usually an associate's degree plus FAA Academy training. Heads up: there's an age cutoff (you generally need to start before 31), and the training washout rate is real, so it's competitive — but it's not a "you need to be a math person" field so much as a "you need to handle pressure and multitask under stress" field.
Skip these for you specifically: dental hygiene, sonography, and similar — they pay well ($84K-$94K) and are often listed as "AI-proof," but they're still hands-on-a-person medical work, which sounds like exactly what you're trying to avoid, even though the patients aren't necessarily "sick."
A couple other options less commonly mentioned:
- Cybersecurity/IT via certifications (Security+, then specialize) — doesn't require a CS degree, moderate math, strong demand, six figures is achievable within several years.
- B2B or technical sales — no math ceiling, income scales with skill rather than credentials, and it's one of the few white-collar paths that's hard for AI to fully replace because it's relationship-driven.
- Court reporting/captioning — chronic worker shortage, no degree needed (just program completion + certification), solid pay, and it's a skill (not knowledge work) so it's fairly insulated.
One honest note: the accounting subreddit venting you saw reflects something real — a lot of white-collar entry-level and mid-level knowledge work is under real pressure right now, and the trades' resistance to that pressure is a genuine structural advantage right now, not just Reddit nostalgia.
Would it help if I asked a couple of quick questions to narrow this down — like whether you'd rather be hands-on/physical or at a desk, and how you feel about a multi-year apprenticeship versus wanting to be earning full pay sooner?
